Back to Selected Work

CASE STUDY · MORGAN STANLEY

MyPractice

Practice Management Dashboard & Financial Performance Command Center

Designing a centralized dashboard that helps Financial Advisors and support teams monitor practice health, track performance, review money movement, and stay aligned with business goals.

Financial PlatformDashboardEnterprise DesktopPractice Management

ROLE

Principal UX Designer / Design Lead

USERS

Financial Advisors, support staff, branch managers, complex managers, regional leaders, and leadership teams

PLATFORM

Enterprise web / desktop dashboard

FOCUS

Dashboard IA, financial performance, practice management, drill-down analysis, data hierarchy, advisor workflows

TOOLS

Figma, wireframes, visual designs, prototypes, stakeholder reviews, existing design system

STATUS

Redesigned / broadly used by advisors and support teams

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE

Some details, screens, and workflows are recreated or generalized to protect confidential information while preserving the design challenge, process, and decision-making approach.

01
SITUATION

Situation

Business context

Financial Advisors, support staff, branch managers, complex managers, regional leaders, and leadership teams all needed a centralized way to monitor practice health, track revenue, compensation, assets under management, and households.

User context

Advisors and support teams needed faster access to performance insights, better visibility into practice health, money movement, alerts, client engagement, rankings, and opportunity tracking — without toggling between disconnected tools.

System context

Performance data, money movement, alerts, and client engagement signals were scattered across legacy systems with no unified dashboard for drill-downs, filtering, exporting, or period comparison.

02
DESIGN CHALLENGE

Design Challenge

Design a centralized dashboard that consolidates revenue, compensation, AUM, households, money movement, alerts, client engagement, rankings, and opportunity tracking into a single enterprise surface — supporting drill-downs, filtering, exporting, and period comparison across multiple user roles.

Fragmented practice data

Advisors and support staff had to navigate multiple disconnected tools to view revenue, AUM, money movement, and client engagement — with no way to see a unified picture of practice health.

Limited visibility for leadership

Branch managers, complex managers, and regional leaders lacked a single surface to monitor performance across their teams, identify trends, and track business goals.

No drill-down or comparison capabilities

Existing tools offered only static views — there was no support for drill-down analysis, period comparison, filtering by practice segments, or exporting data for downstream use.

Multi-role accessLegacy system integrationHigh data densityRegulatory complianceReal-time dataDrill-down analysis
03
MY ROLE

My Role

What I led

End-to-end design from information architecture and workflow mapping through wireframes, visual designs, prototypes, and stakeholder reviews — working within the existing design system.

What I designed

The centralized dashboard experience including practice health overview, revenue and compensation views, AUM and households monitoring, money movement tracking, alerts and opportunities, drill-down analysis, period comparison, and filter/export patterns.

Who I partnered with

Financial Advisors, support staff, branch managers, complex managers, regional leaders, leadership teams, product managers, and engineering.

04
MAKING THE WORKFLOW VISIBLE

Making the Workflow Visible

Mapped the daily workflows of Financial Advisors, support staff, and branch managers to identify the critical moments where practice health data, money movement signals, and performance insights drive real decisions.

ADVISOR & SUPPORT WORKFLOW · PRACTICE HEALTH MONITORING → DRILL-DOWN → ACTION
05
EXPLORING THE EXPERIENCE

Exploring the Experience

Dashboard IA

Mapped the information hierarchy across revenue, AUM, households, money movement, alerts, and opportunity tracking.

Practice health overview

Explored layouts for surfacing high-level KPIs and practice health signals at a glance.

Revenue & compensation

Tested visual treatments for revenue tracking, compensation breakdowns, and period comparison views.

AUM & households

Designed views for monitoring assets under management, household counts, and growth trends.

Drill-down analysis

Prototyped progressive drill-down patterns from practice-level summaries into detailed breakdowns.

Filter & export patterns

Explored filtering, segmenting, and exporting workflows for advisors and leadership teams.

06
THE SOLUTION

The Solution

A centralized dashboard that gives Financial Advisors, support teams, and leadership a unified view of practice health — with revenue, compensation, AUM, households, money movement, alerts, rankings, and opportunity tracking — all supporting drill-downs, filtering, exporting, and period comparison.

PRIMARY SOLUTION · DASHBOARD VIEW

Practice health overview

At-a-glance summary of key practice metrics, performance status, and health indicators for advisors and support teams.

Revenue & compensation

Detailed views of revenue tracking, compensation breakdowns, and period-over-period comparison.

AUM & households

Monitoring of assets under management, household counts, growth trends, and segment breakdowns.

Money movement

Tracking of money movement activity including inflows, outflows, and net movement patterns.

Alerts & opportunities

Prioritized alerts, client engagement signals, opportunity tracking, and rankings visibility.

Drill-down & export

Progressive drill-down from summary views into detailed analysis, with filtering and data export capabilities.

07
KEY DESIGN DECISIONS

Key Design Decisions

Multi-role dashboard architecture

WHYFinancial Advisors, support staff, branch managers, and leadership all need different views of the same underlying data.
TRADEOFFIncreased design and engineering complexity vs. a single surface that serves the full organizational hierarchy.
RESULTEach user role sees the data most relevant to their responsibilities without needing separate tools.

Progressive drill-down model

WHYUsers need to move from high-level practice health summaries into granular data — revenue detail, household breakdowns, money movement specifics.
TRADEOFFDeeper navigation depth vs. reduced information overload at each level.
RESULTAdvisors and managers can start broad and drill into exactly the data they need without leaving the dashboard.

Period comparison and filtering

WHYPerformance tracking requires comparing across time periods and filtering by practice segments, regions, or teams.
TRADEOFFMore complex filter UI vs. actionable performance insight for leadership and advisors.
RESULTUsers can compare performance across periods and segments, supporting better-informed business decisions.

Integrated alerts and opportunity tracking

WHYAdvisors need proactive signals — not just historical data — to act on client engagement, money movement, and business opportunities.
TRADEOFFAlert fatigue risk vs. timely action on high-priority signals.
RESULTAdvisors see prioritized alerts and opportunities alongside their performance data, enabling faster response.
08
IMPACT

Impact

USER IMPACT

Financial Advisors and support teams gained faster access to practice health insights, replacing fragmented workflows with a single, unified dashboard.

BUSINESS IMPACT

Better visibility into revenue, AUM, money movement, and opportunity tracking — enabling more informed decisions across the practice hierarchy.

OPERATIONAL IMPACT

Consolidated multiple legacy views into one dashboard, reducing the number of tools advisors and managers need to monitor daily.

PRODUCT IMPACT

Established the dashboard design pattern, drill-down model, and data hierarchy approach used across subsequent advisor-facing tools.

09
REFLECTION

Reflection

What I learned

Designing for multiple user roles — from individual advisors to regional leaders — requires building a flexible information architecture that scales vertically through the org without losing clarity at any level.

What I would improve

I would invest more upfront in understanding how each role actually uses performance data day-to-day, rather than assuming shared needs across the advisor and leadership hierarchy.

How this shaped my approach

This project reinforced that enterprise dashboard design is fundamentally an information hierarchy problem — the visual layer only works when the data architecture beneath it reflects real user decision patterns.